User talk:Meisam

Barnstar

		The Copyright inspector Barnstar
		Thank you so much for your hard work, you deserve it Huib talk 17:57, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Many Thanks Huib.... -- Meisam (talk) 10:12, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Violations

Hi I am Nima Farid the creator of Tehran expressways map and Seals of Abadeh. I wrote the sources of those maps and I'll write it for you to know: As I said in the summery of the maps I downloaded the File:TehranBlank.PNG but this photo was deleted by User:Otourly. Then I showed the Expressway on the map of Tehran and I uploaded it and I mentioned the source. For seals of Abadeh: This file:File:Abadeh seal.jpg: I took the picture by my own mobile phone Nokia 3500c and if you don't believe it I can send you my mobile phone's picture to you. And File:Seal of Abadeh.png I draw this picture by Paint by putting the last photo in front of myself. So I demand you to delete the deleting Template but you can delete other Shahrdari Signs. Nima Farid (talk) 15:59, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About the maps:

Your maps are considered a derivative work from a copyrighted map. As you should noticed, the File:TehranBlank.PNG had been created from maps of http://www.tehrangis.com which are all copyrighted (Copyright © 2007 TehranGIS . All rights reserved.)

And About your municipality logos.

These logos are also derivative works which inherit the same copyright as their source. All works of Iranian Government are copyrighted and so you should not use them. Redrawing logos won't solve the problem as they inherit the copyright of original source which is not free.

-- Meisam (talk) 16:24, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cat fixing

Hello, thank you for fixing my cat mess (Mosques in NL). --Ziko (talk) 22:40, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hope to be a better help ... -- Meisam (talk) 05:49, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

file:Tabriz profile.jpg

salam meisam xan man najour elim bi ahs remove olmasin ? man akkslarinan ijaza almisham va ahsilarinan estefada elamisham . bi ahsi choxli maghalalar estefada elir --Bakhish2010 (talk) 07:00, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Əkkasların bire mənəm ke məndən icazə almamısız. Obiriləri də buna tay olsa əys gərəh silinə. -- Meisam (talk) 15:35, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abubakirov Rishat Fazlutdinovich.jpg

Salam Licensing:

	The copyright holder of this file, Государственная Дума Федерального Собрания Российской Федерации, allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that the copyright holder is properly attributed. Redistribution, derivative work, commercial use, and all other use is permitted.
	Attribution: © Государственная Дума Федерального Собрания Российской Федерации Подтверждение: см. здесь Attribution

That license tag is not for "copyrighted" images! You can't upload copyrighted images to Commons. Please read the instructions. -- Meisam (talk) 12:00, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"All materials of the official website of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation may be reproduced in any media servers on the Internet or in any other media without any limit on the amount and timing of publication" in russian}} --Moreorless (talk) 12:07, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and fixed. -- Meisam (talk) 12:12, 28 December 2012 (UTC)‌[reply]

Hello

Hey, These photos were obtained from VOA, is it violating any laws if we upload pictures obtained from that film? These paintings were shown in that film as put at the corner of his workshop. Is there any way they can be some how dealt with in a correct way? --Sicaspi (talk) 00:30, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The VOA was not the copyright holder. The original author (painter) is still alive so the copyright belongs to him. There's no way to use copyrighted materials on commons. -- Meisam (talk) 18:13, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you read this section, at least some of them were painted before 1364 and were published in Iran. Can they be retrieved in 1394? --Sicaspi (talk) 01:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

According to "Law for the Protection of Authors, Composers and Artists Rights" of Iran, publication is considered only for photographic and cinematographic works. The paintings will be in public domain 50 years after the death of author. -- Meisam (talk) 13:01, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

یالنیشلیق

بی اولسا یاراتدیغینیز شکیلده، تورك یئرینه تورک یازاسینیز. گوله گوله --Arjanizary (talk) 17:04, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Arjanizary bəy, Osmanlı dilində تورك ادبیاتی yazilir. -- Meisam (talk) 17:17, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

دئدیم به تورکجه یازمیسینیز. اولدو. --Arjanizary (talk) 13:42, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editor @ ar.wiki

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:20, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks. I got the email regarding user group change. -- Meisam (talk) 08:51, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE: File tagging File:Ailee headshot.jpg

No problem! ;) --Chiyako92 (talk) 12:27, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

حذف پرونده‌ها در ویکی انبار

درود. من تعدادی از تصاویر کار خودم را در ویکی آپلود کردم که قبلا در سایت پانورامیو (گالری دوم)آپلود کردم و بعضا به صفحه اون عکس در پانورامیو لینک دادم . بعضی از عکسها به عنوان اثر شخصی در ویکی آپلود کردم و بعضی با مجوز کریتیو کامانر و لینک به عکس. در صفحه گالری در سابت پانورامیو هم مجوز لازم گذاشتم. مدتی قبل با وجود این که با ایمیلی که در گالری پانورامیو به عنوان ایمیل صاحب اثر گذاشتم به ویکی ایمیل زدم که نشون بده صاحب اثر هستم ولی باز هم عکس که نگاره برگزیده هم بود حذف شد. امروز هم چند مورد دیگه از عکسهای شخصی فاقد مجوز مناسب معرفی شده که یکی از آنها نگاره برگزیده است. لطفا برای حل این مشکل راهنمایی کنید.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Golestan_Town_Shiraz_Hadi_Karimi.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Twin_palm_Chahvarz_Hadi_Karimi.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tangab_Dam_Hadi_Karimi.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Khafrooyeh_Garden_4_Hadi_Karimi.jpg

--Alamarvdasht (talk) 09:07, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

سلام. مجوزی که در سایت پانورامیو دیده‌می‌شود، اجازه‌ی استفاده‌ی تجاری و یا تغییر عکس را نمی‌دهد. در مورد ایمیل هم، برایتان ایمیلی فرستاده‌اند که این مجوزها با ویکی‌مدیا کامانز سازگار نیست. Commons:انتخاب مجوز را بخوانید. همچنین از ایمیلی که فرستاده‌اید مشخص نیست که فرستنده‌ی ایمیل صاحب آن حساب در پانورامیو است. -- Meisam (talk) 09:14, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

برای حذف نشدن تصاویرتان دو روش وجود دارد: ۱) مجوز عکس‌ها را در پانورامیو به CC-BY یا CC-BY-SA تغییر دهید. یا اینکه ۲) در پروفایل پانورامیو ایمیل خودتان را افزوده و رویه‌ی Commons:OTRS/fa را دنبال کنید. -- Meisam (talk) 10:00, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

-- .مجوز عکسها در پانورامیو را تغییر دادم ولی عکسها حذف شده. اگر امکان بازگرداندن وجود داره لطفا عکسهایی که قبلا حذف شده اند هم برگردانید. با تشکر

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Golestan_Town_Shiraz_Hadi_Karimi.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Twin_palm_Chahvarz_Hadi_Karimi.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tangab_Dam_Hadi_Karimi.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Khafrooyeh_Garden_4_Hadi_Karimi.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Derak_Mount_Shiraz_Hadi_Karimi.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Galoobardakan-Hadi_Karimi.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tange_boragh-Hadi_Karimi.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tecomella_Undulata.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alamarvdasht (talk • contribs)

هنوزهم در مجوز برخی از عکس‌هایتان امکان استفاده‌ی تجاری از آنها وجود ندارد. به عنوان مثال: [1]. بقیه‌ی آنها در چند روز آینده بررسی‌شده و احیا می‌شوند. -- Meisam (talk) 09:42, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

این عکس مربوط به گالری دوم بود که مجوز آن گالری هم اصلاح شد. با تشکر از شما --Alamarvdasht (talk) 10:16, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

همه‌ی آن عکس‌ها را برگرداندم. آخری هم اینجاست -- Meisam (talk) 19:09, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

سلام. لینک تصاویر اصلاح شده جهت بازبینی در صفحه بحث خودم گذاشتم. با تشکر--Alamarvdasht (talk) 14:26, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Out of process undeletion

Regarding File:Farkhondeh Hajizadeh - فرخنده حاجی زاده.jpg: I understand you are a new administrator. Please do not use your tools outside of process. To restore deleted images, we use COM:UD. Эlcobbola _talk 20:15, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It was deleted based on a "some smaller version could be found elsewhere". I undeleted it based on a user's request as I saw all the uploader's files are taken by the same camera and looked reasonable enough to be self-made. If it looks suspicious, all photos have the same situation. I'll look more into it. -- Meisam (talk) 20:49, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We received the permission by OTRS #2014080710012237 -- Meisam (talk) 22:21, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

تشکر و قدردانی

سلام میثم جان. ممنون بابت تلاشت جهت پاک نشدن تصاویر خانم رومیسا مفیدی. تمام تصاویر ایشان را من رده‌دهی خوب کردم و شما نیز آنها را اثبات کردید. خوشحالم که اگرچه سالهاست در ویکی فارسی شما را نمی‌بینم، ولی اینجا کاملن هوشیارانه از فرهنگ ایران دفاع می‌کنید.SaMin SAmIN (talk) 20:39, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

سلام. انجام وظیفه‌است. گرچه ۲ سال را نمی‌شود «سالها» به حساب آورد. -- Meisam (talk) 20:59, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sajed.ir

Salaam Alaykom. I'm trying to get in touch with Sajed.ir so that they can fix the alleged problems and we can use the pics in commons. Although most of the pics are now useable here, I'm trying to make it completely useable! I followed the pages discussing the problems of this website and found some points which should be fixed. For example, some of their pics were borrowed from other sources! and some of them were TV screen shot. The major problem, as was mentioned in those various long discussions, were not mentioning the authors and/or creators. So my questions are as such:

How can Sajed.ir fix this problem considering the fact that some of the photographers are really unknown and the pics date back to almost 30 years ago?
Does the fact that Sajed.ir is a subsection of governmental organizations changes its copy right rules? How?
What else do you think should be done to make the site completely useable? Thanks Mhhossein (talk) 03:49, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I tried to contact them on 08-13-2014 by email and their own contact form but they did not answer.

If photographer is unknown, there must be a proof of publication in 30 years ago. According to Iranian copyright laws, just being taken 30 years ago will not grant us the right to use it.
It won't matter. Because, unlike United States, we do not have a different copyright law for governmental offices.
The version of GFDL must be included in the license, for example GFDL 1.2 or GFDL 1.3. Because they have substantial differences which are really important.

-- Meisam (talk) 19:49, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed

I have just noticed that you resigned last month. I hope you will return to us soon. Green Giant (talk) 21:46, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your attention. Unfortunately, my real life currently is in the middle of big changes. I hope to be back soon. -- Meisam (talk) 13:19, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

help me

I have been attacked by user:Herby in [2] --Sonia Sevilla (talk) 11:59, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lock House - Lock 18.jpg lock identified

With this file you uploaded, I figured out which lock that lock is: it is Lock 18 in Great Falls. Compare that photo with modern photos, and it's lock 18.

I put a little thing on the category so the sort order it comes out with other pictures of Lock 18, but it may be good to rename the file so that 18 appears in the file name.

Neat pic, though. Thanks!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bonnachoven (talk • contribs)

Done Thanks for your helps and sorry for me being late. I resigned and did not have the permission to move images afterwards. -- Meisam (talk) 20:48, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zeiss image donation

Hi,

If you upload images from Zeiss's Flickr account, please add {{Zeiss Microscopy}} to the description, so that we can track this image donation. Alternatively, if you prefer you can wait for me to do one of my regular batch uploads, (or nudge me if you're waiting for something). Thank you. Andy Mabbett (talk) 19:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Coluche

Hello, I don't know how to suppress the photo of Coluche (French artist) wich is a real copyvio. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coluche_sur_scène.jpg Thank's for your kind help. ;) 18:54, 4 September 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A01:E35:2FDF:4D20:216:CBFF:FEA7:C51A (talk) 18:54, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept the discussion here! -- Meisam (talk) 19:04, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Guardian Analytics.jpg

Hey. I took the photo of Guardian Analytics via my own Canon T4i camera when I worked at the company. As for the other photo (ShahinRad.png) you may have a point. --Kazemita1 (talk) 06:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States. Any photo of the creative works which you take with your camera, will inherit the original copyright by their respective authors. -- Meisam (talk) 20:56, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

سلام

میثم جون این تصویر رو من از اینترنت پیدا نکردم از خود خواننده ینی سوزانا گرفتم و فایل هیچ اینفورمیشنی مبنی بر اینکه کپی باشه نداره! تو اینستاگرام این خواننده بنده رو فالو میکنه با اجازه از خودش عکس رو ازش گرفتم و تو هیچ سایتی نیست به عنوان عکسی که کپی باشه و شما برای بار چندم دارید حذف میکنید میخواید تو اینستاگرام فالوتون کنم با پیجم که سوزانا فالو کرده و خود سوزانا با پیج رسمیش بهتون بگه من اجازه گرفتم و خودش عکس رو داده Mohammadrajabloo (talk) 20:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

سلام. لطفاً از ایشان بخواهید مجوز انتشار آزاد عکس را خودشان از طریق COM:OTRS ارسال کنند. -- Meisam (talk) 20:32, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

سلام دوباره

ایشون خواننده هست وقت ویکی پدیا نداره مثل منو شما وقتش آزاد نیست چیکار باید کنینم؟ ، راستی مشخص نیست اصلا شما رباتی انسانی همه ژوئن هارو زدی بلدم مگه میشه اگه انسانی ایرانی مارو در جریان بذار اگه از متجرم استفاده میکنید مثل گوگل ترنسلیت بگید Mohammadrajabloo (talk) 22:46, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

اگر خودشان وقت ندارند می توانند به مدیر برنامه‌شان، منشی‌شان، یا عکاس بگویند که نامه رسمی بفرستد. اگر انگلیسی نمی‌دانید COM:OTRS/fa را بخوانید. -- Meisam (talk) 22:52, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

عکاسی در آتلیه‌ها

سلام. نظرتان راجع به حق نشر عکس‌هایی که در آتلیه‌ها در ایران گرفته می‌شود، چیست؟ حقوق متعلق به عکاس است یا سفارش‌دهنده؟

نظر خانم سوره صادقی آن است که متعلق به سفارش‌دهنده است.

سوم- عکاسی سفارشی از جمله در آتلیه‌های عکاسی یا توسط عکاس‌های آتلیه‌ها در مراسم‌ها و… در این مورد طبق قانون فعلی ایران (۱۳۴۸)، سفارش دهنده (=مشتری) دارنده کپی‌رایت به حساب می‌آید. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:06, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@4nn1l2: سلام بر امیر، از آنجایی که قانون حق تکثیر در ایران در مورد چنین مواردی (همچون بسیاری از موارد دیگر) سکوت کرده، می‌شود آن را مصداقی از سفارش (مشمول ماده ۱۳ قانون) به‌شمار آورد. اما به نظرم این ادعا که:

سفارشی در میان بوده و
بر طبق قرارداد آن سفارش این اثر ایجادشده و
بر طبق همان قرارداد، تمام حقوق مادی اثر به سفارش‌دهنده منتقل‌شده

بدیهی نیست و نیاز به اثبات‌دارد. -- Meisam (talk) 19:47, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

image not useful?

Hi Meisam, you uploaded File:B'fly on my shoe (Ehrwald-Buchenwald) (23964243809).jpg from flickr and put some quality caveats on it. IMHO the image is not useful and could be deleted before trying to fix the quality issues. Maybe you as the uploader may request deletion? best --Herzi Pinki (talk) 23:04, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Herzi Pinki: Thanks for your attention to the quality. I started the deletion request. Also, you can always request any of the image I've uploaded for deletion. There's no hard feeling about it. Cheers! -- Meisam (talk) 09:17, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:21, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Picasso / Copyright

You should be cautiousː Works by Pablo PicaSso (Museum Berggruen in Berlin) may not be in the public domain, because the artist has not been dead for at least 70 years. ː--Warburg1866 (talk) 20:37, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Warburg1866: Thanks for reminding. I'll tag them now. -- Meisam (talk) 20:40, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cezanne, Women Bathing, c. 1900, Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, Copenhagen (1) (36283334081).jpg

Hi, Could you please fix the author and the license (PD-Art)? And that's the case for all your uploads. Thanks, Yann (talk) 21:36, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: Hi Yann! Sure! I Will do so ASAP! BTW, Thanks for the helps. -- Meisam (talk) 21:44, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicates

Hi, you've uploaded a few duplicates in Segovia, can fix it? Thanks. --Joanbanjo (talk) 21:43, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Joanbanjo: Hi! Thanks for your helps in categorization. The files are not listed in Special:ListDuplicatedFiles yet (it is limited to 5000). I couldn't find the duplicates without manually checking all the files. If you encounter any dulicates, please tag them by {{Duplicate}}. Many thanks! -- Meisam (talk) 21:53, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for thanking me

Hi Meisam, I'm doing it for the overall quality and sake of Commons. Not especially for you. If you would categorize one image properly, instead of thanking me having done that for you, it would be much more contribution to commons. See e.g. https://petscan.wmflabs.org/?psid=4923338 for images uploaded by you, needing your check and having coordinates (which makes it rather simple to find the objects on the maps). best --Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:05, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Herzi Pinki: I really appreciate your hard works. Consider those thanks for all the other good works you do for in Commons! I'm trying hard to keep up with categorizing the images I've uploaded. I have put all of them in a clean-up category and use the watchlist to keep track of them. But it is always nice to see other people helping too. Thanks again. Cheers! -- Meisam (talk) 09:13, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Squirrel files

I wanted to get your input on requesting renaming of those files you uploaded that have odd names. It looks like the person on Flickr actually gave the squirrels human names but those don't really translate well to file names and having something like File:'Belinda' (15262390078).webm or File:'Samantha' Drops in for Breakfast (11025374995).jpg be about squirrels seems a little confusing to me. Thoughts? --Majora (talk) 21:29, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Majora: I see your point. I always try to respect the photographers’ preferred names as a symbol of appreciation for their works. But in this case, adding a descriptive tag to the start of the names (i.e. File:Squirrel - 'Belinda' (15262390078).webm or something similar) may not be a bad idea.

BTW, for a light discussion on the subject of naming the animals please take a few minutes to watch John Oliver’s Interview with Dr. Jane Goodall. Thanks for your helps! -- Meisam (talk) 21:55, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Or adding "(squirrel)" to the names may be another option! It looks like most of the times the animal names have single quotations around them and the zookeepers are named without quotation marks (e.g. File:'Anthony' and Katie (7888228344).jpg). But not all the time (File:'Chick please, Matt' (5563409079).jpg)! -- Meisam (talk) 21:49, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anything more identifiable than human names would probably be ok. I just don't see anyone being able to find those images unless they were looking through the category first. And even then, naming them after people is not indicative of what is actually being displayed. --Majora (talk) 01:47, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Majora: If anyone use the search function, it will include the filename, file description, and its categories. IMO anything general about what is being displayed should be a category and unique features should be in the description of the image. I think we need more specific categories for these animals. Cheers! -- Meisam (talk) 11:05, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for aircraft files

Good afternoon Meisam. Recently, somebody asked you to "Hi Meisam, please give useful categories to the images you upload." Maybe you have not worked very much with aircraft files before.

In this edit you only added the "Category:2015 at London Oxford Airport", which is correct, of course.

However, the single most import category for an aircraft is "type", because it is the only one which is never going to change in the life of an aircraft (and therefore a kind of "grand parent" cat). Everything else may change during all the years in which pictures of this aircraft are taken: the registration, the operator/airline, the colour, and of course the locations and years referring to the individual file (picture).

Therefore, I kindly ask you to never the ""XXX Airport by year"-category only. Please always add the "Aircraft at XXX Airport" cat, and - just if you happen to know it - instead the sub-cat "Aircraft at London Oxford Airport by aircraft type" together with the correct type of aircraft. In this example the file finally ends up in Category:Bombardier Challenger 604 at London Oxford Airport. You don't have to create a new category if it's not yet there - in this case you can as well just use the "Aircraft at XXX Airport" cat.

Please do not consider my comment as criticism; it is just something very high on the wish-list of the "Aviation People" to have the most characteristic item of a file in place. Thank you very much for your future help and have a good day (for the rest of it, wherever you are)! Kind regards --Uli Elch (talk) 14:18, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Uli Elch: Hi Uli! The file you are referring to is not uploaded by me. I’m just trying to help according to this to add the categories mentioned as “a bare minimum” (No. 4). I’ll try to do better. Cheers! -- Meisam (talk) 14:37, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your quick answer! This "bare minimum" list has been disputed often before; unfortunately, in its current condition it only represents the private, un-coordinated opinion of a globally blocked user.

When adding and correcting cats they don't have to be uploaded by yourself. It is a work very much appreciated, especially because exactly this user has uploaded tens of thousands of files (under hundreds of sockpuppet names) without any category!

My point is simply to add the "Aircraft at XXX Airport" cat or (only if convenient) any more precise "Type of aircraft ..." cat, because editors writing an article are usually trying to find suitable pictures in the "Type" or "Airline" cats, but certainly not in "1999 at Grassfield Aerodrome".

By the way, I just saw you are from (living in?) Azerbaijan. I remember Baku and the adjoining Caucasus region as very interesting and impressive regions; I had really enjoyed several short journey them. --Uli Elch (talk) 14:51, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Uli Elch: I fully agree with your point and will try to add the "Aircraft at XXX Airport" categories to the files I come across.

When I first started categorizing the aviation files, I searched for the naming/categorizing guidelines but I couldn’t find anything in Commons:WikiProject Aviation. I’m still not completely sure about the structure of the category tree for the aircrafts [3] Also, there are still open discussions like this. I think having a guideline for categorization can hugely benefit the project and also help the new users who want to contribute. Let me know if I can help in anyway. Thanks for your patience in explaining the stuff to the other users. I know it can be frustrating sometimes.

BTW, I’m from en:Azerbaijan (Iran) but currently living abroad. -- Meisam (talk) 15:14, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks once again. Your idea in the "AX-2343"-question seems to be very reasonable to me, too. However, I think the sections "Police aircraft of XXX" and "Air ambulances of XXX by registration" should be included in the "Normal" reg-list as long as they do not carry registrations out of the normal civilian sequence (like this one).

Unfortunately, I'm just running out of time a bit ahead of our vacation, so I cannot at present discuss it all in detail as in your mentioned discussion. I'd like to finish a few simple structural edits before. See you later and best regards --Uli Elch (talk) 15:28, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MSBOT adding subcategories

Hello! I have noticed this change your bot has made. I haven't really double-checked what was the reason for omitting the "B" letter, but it doesn't seem correct. Could you look into it, please? Best regards! --GeXeS (talk) 05:29, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@GeXeS: Hi! That was intentional. B is a part of the Bermuda's prefix for aircraft registeration. Not omitting it will sort all the aircraft categories under the B-section. -- Meisam (talk) 09:47, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see, thanks for the explanation :o) --GeXeS (talk) 10:20, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Results from global Wikimedia survey 2018 are published

Hello! A few months ago the Wikimedia Foundation invited you to take a survey about your experiences on Wikipedia. You signed up to receive the results. The report is now published on Meta-Wiki! We asked contributors 170 questions across many different topics like diversity, harassment, paid editing, Wikimedia events and many others.

Read the report or watch the presentation, which is available only in English. Add your thoughts and comments to the report talk page. Feel free to share the report on Wikipedia/Wikimedia or on your favorite social media. Thanks!
--EGalvez (WMF)

19:25, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Categorization

We just lost the only image of Turkish composer Murat Ses. I do not know if I could do anything to prevent it, but did not see the DR on time. As you may know, he was the founder and a member of the group Ağrı Dağı Efsanesi. Now we are left only with an old vinyl of the music of this composer and his group. As Category:Murat Ses is empty, I will add the group under his cat. If we do it the other way, than we will not have a trace of Murat Ses who has articles in a couple of Wikipedias, while the group -I am astonished why- has none. Best. --E4024 (talk) 14:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@E4024: To keep the Wikimedia Commons free and accessible for everybody, the copyright issues must be taken very seriously. As he is alive and still active, it is possible to find free photos of Murat Ses. The categories can be sorted out later when we find more related images. IMO, unfortunately, the reputation of the Ağrı Dağı Efsanesi band has been overshadowed by the song of the same name and also due to its short life (1972-76).

For a while I was creating Wikidata items for the relatively less widely known Turkish bands/musicians. You will find “Ağrı Dağı Efsanesi” and other familiar names in the list of the items I’ve created.

BTW, the good music never dies! ☺ Saygılarla Meisam (talk) 21:47, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is Mavi Işıklar among them? :) --E4024 (talk) 00:33, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@E4024: Definitely! -- Meisam (talk) 21:00, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ham Contest Exchange.ogg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content.

We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules.

In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files.

Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions.

Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.

العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ Nederlands ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ русский ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ +/−

Yours sincerely, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 08:21, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2: can you please explain why this is copyrighted? -- Meisam (talk) 08:27, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, none of the files which you have marked "the uploader asserts that the usage of this file is fair use". I will revert your edits. -- Meisam (talk) 08:45, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Toolforge problems

Hey Meisam,

I probably wont make it to Wikimuc tonight, but I have tried converting photos on Toolforge in the last week, with varying results. Good news first: Toolforge does have ImageMagick preinstalled with support for jp2. Conversion does work when submitting a 80MB file with 8GB ram, but it wont finish successfully for an 430MB file, even when submitting it to the queue with 20GB ram. Hope I see you on Tuesday ;) Kristbaum (talk) 11:46, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Kristbaum: For the large files, please monitor the CPU/memory usage to ensure that the conversion is running out of memory. If 20GB is the maximum available memory on the Toolforge nodes, we may need to use ImageMagick with MPI on multiple nodes. -- Meisam (talk) 12:27, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kristbaum: Can you please run it again while setting the MAGICK_MEMORY_LIMIT or MAGICK_AREA_LIMIT environment variable? -- Meisam (talk) 22:09, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) FYI: Toolforge Grid nodes, which I assume is what you are referring to by the queue, has 8G physical ram each. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 06:59, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stolpersteine Nikolsburger Platz

Hallo Meisam, bei Umbennenung bitte nicht den Ortsteil (File:Stolperstein Nikolsburger Platz 4 Sarah Franziska Löwenthal.jpg - File:Stolperstein Nikolsburger Platz 4 (Wilmd) Sarah Franziska Löwenthal.jpg) vergessen. Woher weisst Du, dass die Stolpersteine an der Hausnummer 4 liegen? OTFW (talk) 08:04, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@OTFW: Hi! I think you mistook me for User:Jeff G. who did the renaming on that file [4] -- Meisam (talk) 11:50, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry OTFW (talk) 11:58, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:IBM 3151 - klawiatura.jpg

I wouldn't dare adding Category:Computer keyboards with QWERTY layout to the said file. Its layout is completely non-standard and it probably passed through many hands before I got it. It's unknown whether this position of Y and Z is its "original" (ie. created by Interdata Sp. z o.o., the company mentioned on a sticker on the keyboard (I never heard of it elsewhere)) or was simply determined by a collector when he was cleaning. (Well, I don't even know what the position was when the thing was delivered to me – I quickly disassembled the 'board to clean it, having forgotten about taking a photo.) The overall layout seems to be inspired by Polish typewriters which were QWERTZ. Regards, PiotrekD (talk) 19:44, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @PiotrekD: Thanks for explaining this. I didn’t notice that the keyboard does not have its original layout. Always feel free to fix any mistake you find in my edits. I’m still trying to clean-up the computer keyboard sub-categories and still there are lots of things to do. Cheers! -- Meisam (talk) 19:55, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I preferred to explain the case here rather than revert the edit with a short summary, as it's rather… unique, let's say ;). PiotrekD (talk)

@PiotrekD: Don't worry! It could be even worse: File:MNACTEC keyboards (30756047990).jpg ;) -- Meisam (talk) 21:52, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Whiter than mine ;). I also have a "modern" (made in 2017 for PC) version of those keyboards made by Unicomp which is black (so it doesn't yellow) and has all keys; I need to take and upload a photo of it one day. (It feels very pleasant to type on it as my main 'board.) PiotrekD (talk) 22:00, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@PiotrekD: I really enjoy the buckling spring mechanism. It is very sharp and snappy! Unfortunately, it is really hard to find a SSK (TKL version) with the ISO layout and it is not available from the unicomp either. The custom ones also cost an arm and a leg! -- Meisam (talk) 22:36, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Saying it is a "QWERTY" layout does not mean it is the standard layout, which varies depending on type of devices. Keyboard for PC or Mac, or mobiles, or typewriters still vary a lot for some characters (including punctuation), or functions and commands. Posting a warning on the description should be enough, but feel free to categorize other photos of "standard" Polish QWERTY layouts for PC, MAC, or typewriters. Note that in most cases, there's not a single standard, manufaturers make a lot of variations. Ideally there should be subcategories for each kind of device, leaving the general layout diagrams separate as they are not really dependant with exact metrics or positions. Here it is a keyboard that was NOT designed for PC or Mac, but a proprietary terminal (see the many function keys). IF someone finds a true documentation of this terminal keyboard, this could be confirmed but for now this is speculation: we just describe here what is on the photo, even if it's a derivation or inventive creation or incorrect mounting. If the disassembler could test the keyboard and see what characters are displayed on the terminal, he could possibly remount it correctly and fix that photo, if this was such error). verdy_p (talk) 14:59, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

سلام میثم! من رو میشناسی؟ بابت آپلود تصاویر تعداد زیادی کیبورد سفید رنگ و رده‌بندی آنها ازت تشکر می‌کنم. من از کیبوردهای سیاه متنفرم، همین تلاش رو ادامه بده و کمتر یا هیچ تصاویر از کیبورد سیاه آپلود کن. Editor-1 (talk) 13:51, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

mNACTEC

Hello Meisam, yes the photos have been correctly categorized. Maybe all these photos could be grouped into a new subcategory 'The Computer Enigma (mNACTEC exhibition)‎' because these are part of a specific collection within the museum (The computer engima). If it seems ok to you, I can make the change. Best regards and thanks, --Auledas (talk) 01:09, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Auledas: Yes! It would be great if you can categorize all your images from the mNACTEC under one of its subcategories. BTW, I found you photo while categorizing this one which looked very similar! Having the photos of the museum under its subcats also helps in identifying and categorizing the new photos. Many thanks! -- 08:18, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

your revert

see [5] - the flickr PD-mark is not accepted on commons - see Commons:Flickr files. Please do not revert these edits anymore. PS: I added the flickr user to the Commons:Questionable Flickr images/Users. Thx. --Ju Ta 10:37, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JuTa: Sorry for the trouble. I was also suspicious at first about the user, but Summers Day 333, Joost J. Bakker and happy days photos and art seem to be the same user or at least they all have access to the same source material! For example, these photos seem to be manually cropped of which the “Summers Day 333” versions have a section which does not exist in the other:

File:SE-AFI Cierva C.30A c.n.735 autogiro from the aviodome (now Aviodrome) on display at Hilversum 20 May 1984 (48084460823).jpg, File:SE-AFI cierva C-30.jpg (check the bottom of the photo)
File:HB-OGC Piper J3C-65 Cub (7159298387).jpg, File:HB-OGG 1943 Piper J3C-65 c.n. 10993 (48084517137).jpg (check the right side)

And about the PD-mark you are right! My mistake! -- Meisam (talk) 10:59, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@JuTa: By the way, due to the PD-mark issue, there's no need for the DR discussion, as the uploader, I request speedy deletion. Many thanks! -- Meisam (talk) 11:12, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that on the DR page please. I will not decide this as I am the requestor. --Ju Ta 14:02, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Meisam (talk) 14:18, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hurtigruten.01.01.1920x1080.NRK2.webm was nominated for MOTD

Your file has been nominated for a Media of the Day.

Your contribution to this project has been noticed. A file Hurtigruten.01.01.1920x1080.NRK2.webm, which was uploaded by you, has been nominated to be displayed on the Main Page of this project as a Media of the Day. You can view this and other nominations at Commons talk:Media of the day. It is always a good idea to let other contributors know when you think your file would look good as a featured media file, provide descriptions in different languages, and perhaps spread the joy by nominating media of other uploaders, that you believe deserve that. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 04:36, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded but unused image

BBC micro bit (26146399942).png

Thanks for uploading BBC micro bit (26146399942).png. It does not appear to be used on any Wikimedia project. If you do not want to use it on any project, please ask an admin to delete it. If you want to use it, click "Download" on the filepage and copy the URL, then paste it into a page on a Wikimedia project (including Commons and Meta-Wiki), or type "[[commons:File:BBC micro bit (26146399942).png]]". To use it on Commons, you can remove "commons:" from the start of the title. Thanks!

Here are suggestions for where you can put your image:

- Micro Bit on Wikipedia

TylerMagee (talk) 08:17, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TylerMagee: This file is in Commons:Project scope. You can add it to any Wikipedia articles as you see fit. If you disagree, you can request it to be deleted. -- Meisam (talk) 08:44, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Braque, Still Life with Pipe, 1914, Museum Berggruen, Berlin (28425273849).jpg

And also:

File:Georges Braque, Still Life with Glass and Newspaper, 1913, Museum Berggruen, Berlin (28425262629).jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 23:48, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Invasion! (4141370417).jpg

And also:

File:Omnibot 2000 (5900602090).jpg

Yours sincerely, — Racconish ^💬 13:17, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MSBOT

Hello !!! Is MSBOT operated by you ???
It seems that MSBOT having bug when adding sort key to categories.
When sorting USA aircrafts, only the first "N" should be omitted.
But MSBOT omitted all "N". As a result, the sorting order is wrong.
Some examples are :
N9NG (aircraft)
N89NC (aircraft)
N786NC (aircraft)

Dltl2010 (talk) 07:40, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dltl2010: Sorry about the problems. I'll check all its edits soon. The bot is not active anymore. -- Meisam (talk) 20:18, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dltl2010: I went through all the bot's edits and fixed the issues. -- Meisam (talk) 10:37, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Samad Vurgun (1924).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, PlanespotterA320 (talk) 11:53, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Video Game Museum in Berlin (45222078774).jpg

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 18:54, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lobster-Phone (4479669148).jpg

File:Lobster-Phone (4479669148).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Gestumblindi (talk) 19:24, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Hamburg (26462277848).jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 05:18, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Renault Mégane R.S. (23525890778).jpg

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 09:51, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Adamite r002 (36188455994).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 18:06, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Memorial to Admiral Yi Sun-sin, 1545-98, Seoul (1) (40419636884).jpg

File:Memorial to Admiral Yi Sun-sin, 1545-98, Seoul (1) (40419636884).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:58, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Memorial to Admiral Yi Sun-sin, 1545-98, Seoul (2) (41130598591).jpg

File:Memorial to Admiral Yi Sun-sin, 1545-98, Seoul (2) (41130598591).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:59, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Memorial to Admiral Yi Sun-sin, 1545-98, Seoul (4) (41087235372).jpg

File:Memorial to Admiral Yi Sun-sin, 1545-98, Seoul (4) (41087235372).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:34, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Memorial to Admiral Yi Sun-sin, 1545-98, Seoul (3) (26259174687).jpg

File:Memorial to Admiral Yi Sun-sin, 1545-98, Seoul (3) (26259174687).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ox1997cow (talk) 15:37, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Statue of Brothers, War Memorial of Korea (2) (39323281210).jpg

And also:

File:Statue of Brothers, War Memorial of Korea (3) (40421126964).jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Rex Nan Kivell 7.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Felix QW (talk) 18:21, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:180520-Z-OL711-0025 (41406681405).jpg

File:180520-Z-OL711-0025 (41406681405).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 10:07, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:180520-Z-OL711-0026 (42307946111).jpg

File:180520-Z-OL711-0026 (42307946111).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 10:07, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:180520-Z-OL711-0027 (41406680955).jpg

File:180520-Z-OL711-0027 (41406680955).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 10:07, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:180520-Z-OL711-0028 (42307944971).jpg

File:180520-Z-OL711-0028 (42307944971).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 10:07, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:180520-Z-OL711-0030 (42307943751).jpg

File:180520-Z-OL711-0030 (42307943751).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 10:07, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Istanbul 2018 (26896963658).jpg

File:Istanbul 2018 (26896963658).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Nanahuatl (talk) 23:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Hamburg (40288694922).jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:04, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gigabyte-force-k7 (10150668585).jpg

File:Gigabyte-force-k7 (10150668585).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Solomon203 (talk) 13:59, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gigabyte-force-k7 (10150809103).jpg

File:Gigabyte-force-k7 (10150809103).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Solomon203 (talk) 13:59, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gigabyte-force-k7 (10150808693).jpg

File:Gigabyte-force-k7 (10150808693).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Solomon203 (talk) 14:00, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Art for sale. The Peak Hong Kong. (11376547505).jpg

File:Art for sale. The Peak Hong Kong. (11376547505).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 09:28, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:No Parking Peacock (29587200336).jpg

File:No Parking Peacock (29587200336).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:48, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Control123.png

Yours sincerely, ~TheImaCow (talk) 14:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Meisam

Barnstar

Copyright Violations

Cat fixing

Hello

یالنیشلیق

Editor @ ar.wiki

RE: File tagging File:Ailee headshot.jpg

حذف پرونده‌ها در ویکی انبار

Out of process undeletion

تشکر و قدردانی

Sajed.ir

Just noticed

help me

Lock House - Lock 18.jpg lock identified

Zeiss image donation

Coluche

سلام

سلام دوباره

عکاسی در آتلیه‌ها

image not useful?

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Picasso / Copyright

Duplicates

Categories

Thank you for thanking me

Squirrel files

Categories for aircraft files

MSBOT adding subcategories

Results from global Wikimedia survey 2018 are published

Categorization

Toolforge problems

Stolpersteine Nikolsburger Platz

Some baklava for you!

mNACTEC

your revert

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hurtigruten.01.01.1920x1080.NRK2.webm was nominated for MOTD

Uploaded but unused image

BBC micro bit (26146399942).png

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

MSBOT

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Navigation menu

Search